Online Arguments





Why did you choose this online argument for your assignment?

I chose this online argument because it exemplifies polite and respectful internet discourse. When analyzing online fights, this picture offers a good illustration of how conflicts can be resolved amicably and constructively without turning into heated or violent discussions. It serves as an example of how people can be polite even when they disagree and that discussions on the internet don't always have to be hostile or aggressive.

Provide three negative examples and concerns you have with this online argument.

  1. Online arguments over bands or artists can occasionally take absurd stances. This one-dimensional way of thinking can impede deep conversations on the subtleties of personal taste and music.
  2. Some people may intentionally provoke other people, which can create an unfriendly and hostile situation.
  3. Online arguments regarding bands can occasionally ignore the emotional attachments that fans have to the songs.

Create five rules for how people should argue online correctly.

  1. Seek Common Ground
  2. Fact-Check Information
  3. Listen and Acknowledge
  4. Respectful Language
  5. Agree to Disagree

The following three links will take you to more articles that offer advice and suggestions on how to effectively argue online.





Citations:

Bates, N. (2016, January 8). Peak British YouTube comments section argument. The Poke. https://www.thepoke.com/2016/01/07/peak-british-youtube-comments-section-argument/ 

People bullying, trolling, dispute online in laptop chat. flat vector... iStock. (n.d.). https://www.istockphoto.com/kr/%EB%B2%A1%ED%84%B0/%EC%98%A8%EB%9D%BC%EC%9D%B8-%EC%B1%84%ED%8C%85-%EB%85%B8%ED%8A%B8%EB%B6%81%EC%9D%84-%EB%B6%88%EB%A7%81-gm1184930608-333745614

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Knapp's Relational Model

Oversharing Online

Online Communication, Business Assessment